Supreme Court issues split decision on Arizona immigration law

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld parts of Arizona’s strict law targeting illegal immigrants, but said the federal government has the ultimate authority to decide who will be held on immigration charges and deported.

The justices said Arizona’s police can stop, question and briefly detain immigrants if officers have reason to believe they are in the country illegally. This was seen as a key part of the state’s law. But the justices said the police have limited authority. They must check with federal immigration agents before deciding to hold the suspects.

The justices also blocked parts of the Arizona’s SB 1070 that would have made it a state crime for illegal immigrants to fail to carry documents or to seek work.

  1. jay252 reblogged this from latimes
  2. liana-wanderlust reblogged this from latimes
  3. anthraxenchiladas reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  4. thekristenshow reblogged this from latimes
  5. always-tete reblogged this from latimes
  6. stompinginmynikes reblogged this from latimes
  7. ibuildnosystem reblogged this from publicradiointernational
  8. luigimonstre reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  9. planetsedge reblogged this from thenoobyorker and added:
    Commentary.
  10. freemasonic-yowl reblogged this from thenoobyorker and added:
    It’s not a state crime, but people can be stopped, questioned, & detained for lacking papers. Police officers still have...
  11. thefishnchips reblogged this from publicradiointernational
  12. ibad reblogged this from latimes
  13. mprnews reblogged this from latimes
  14. daughterofassata reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  15. thenoobyorker reblogged this from latimes and added:
    This is about as good as it gets with this court, unfortunately the federal government hasn’t been a saint in this...
  16. publicradiointernational reblogged this from latimes
  17. krimemasters reblogged this from latimes
  18. wewritedrunkandeditsober reblogged this from latimes
  19. misterdodo reblogged this from latimes
  20. latimes posted this